Esposito v. Kavco, Inc., No. Spnh 9808-55718 (Nov. 3, 1998)

1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 13298
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedNovember 3, 1998
DocketNo. SPNH 9808-55718
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 13298 (Esposito v. Kavco, Inc., No. Spnh 9808-55718 (Nov. 3, 1998)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Esposito v. Kavco, Inc., No. Spnh 9808-55718 (Nov. 3, 1998), 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 13298 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure of Plaintiff to CT Page 13299 Present a Prima Facie Case is granted. Despite the cautionary language contained in the plaintiff's notice to quit, it is clear from the plaintiff's own testimony that he continued to collect "rent" from the defendant after service of the notice to quit. The plaintiff followed the same pattern of accepting almost daily payments, in arrears, that he had established over a five year period.

"In a month to month tenancy, an acceptance by the landlord of a tender of rent after the service of a notice to quit renders the notice void and creates a new tenancy." O P Realty v.Santana, 17 Conn. App. 314, 317 (1989). It cannot be held, under the peculiar facts of this case, that the plaintiff's conduct after service of the notice to quit was an unequivocal endorsement of the notice to quit. The tenancy was reinstated by the plaintiff, and his attempt to evict the defendant for nonpayment of rent must fail.

BY THE COURT

Edward J. Leavitt, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O & P Realty v. Santana
551 A.2d 1287 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 13298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/esposito-v-kavco-inc-no-spnh-9808-55718-nov-3-1998-connsuperct-1998.