Esposito v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

D. Nevada

Esposito v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

DecidedMay 19, 2025

Docket2:25-cv-00588

StatusUnknown

This text of Esposito v. Costco Wholesale Corporation (Esposito v. Costco Wholesale Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Esposito v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, (D. Nev. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 HOPE LEE ESPOSITO, Case No. 2:25-cv-00588-MMD-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), Order 9] v. 10! COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, 11 Defendant(s). 12 Defendant filed an answer prior to removal. Docket No. 1-1 at 24. To date, the parties 13] have not filed a stipulated discovery plan as required by Local Rule 26-1(a).! A joint discovery 14] plan must be filed by May 29, 2025. 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 Dated: May 19, 2025 17 7 Nancy JKoppe 18 United States Magistrate Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ' The Court expresses no opinion herein as to whether the case will be remanded pursuant to the pending order to show cause. See Docket No. 9. The pendency of the remand issue is not 27} grounds to delay discovery. F.g., Flynn v. Nev., 345 F.R.D. 338, 345 (D. Nev. Jan. 3, 2024) (quoting Grammer vy. Colo. Hosp. Ass’n Shred Servs., Inc., 2015 WL 3938406, at *2 (D. Nev. June 28] 26, 2015)).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 HOPE LEE ESPOSITO, Case No. 2:25-cv-00588-MMD-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), Order 9] v. 10! COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, 11 Defendant(s). 12 Defendant filed an answer prior to removal. Docket No. 1-1 at 24. To date, the parties 13] have not filed a stipulated discovery plan as required by Local Rule 26-1(a).! A joint discovery 14] plan must be filed by May 29, 2025. 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 Dated: May 19, 2025 17 7 Nancy JKoppe 18 United States Magistrate Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ' The Court expresses no opinion herein as to whether the case will be remanded pursuant to the pending order to show cause. See Docket No. 9. The pendency of the remand issue is not 27} grounds to delay discovery. F.g., Flynn v. Nev., 345 F.R.D. 338, 345 (D. Nev. Jan. 3, 2024) (quoting Grammer vy. Colo. Hosp. Ass’n Shred Servs., Inc., 2015 WL 3938406, at *2 (D. Nev. June 28] 26, 2015)).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Esposito v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/esposito-v-costco-wholesale-corporation-nvd-2025.