Esposita v. Suntrust Bank
This text of Esposita v. Suntrust Bank (Esposita v. Suntrust Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
DEANO S. ESPOSITA,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D17-3552
SUNTRUST BANK, AMY C. ESPOSITA, REGIONS BANK D/B/A AMSOUTH BANK AND MAGNOLIA PLANTATION HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.,
Appellees. /
Opinion filed February 2, 2018
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Susan Stacy, Judge.
Deano S. Esposita, Lake Mary, pro se.
Charles P. Gufford, of McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC, Orlando, for Appellee, SunTrust Bank.
No appearance for other Appellees.
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to SunTrust Bank’s Confession of Error, we reverse the Summary Final
Judgment of Foreclosure, as the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the judgment
because the case had been removed to federal court. We remand this matter to the trial court for further proceedings.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
SAWAYA, ORFINGER, and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Esposita v. Suntrust Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/esposita-v-suntrust-bank-fladistctapp-2018.