Esplen v. Maryland Casualty Co.

501 So. 2d 670, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 260, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6280
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 14, 1987·No. No. 4-86-0109·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final judgment denying uninsured motorist benefits to claimants upon authority of Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 252 So.2d 229 (Fla.1971); Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut v. Beem, 469 So.2d 138 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); and Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Kauffman, 495 So.2d 1184 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

REVERSED.

DELL, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Esplen v. Maryland Casualty Co., 501 So. 2d 670, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 260, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6280 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

501 So. 2d 670 (Esplen v. Maryland Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

AUTO. INS. CO. OF HARTFORD v. Beem
469 So. 2d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
252 So. 2d 229 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Kauffman
495 So. 2d 1184 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)