Espiritu v. State

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided March 18, 2015·No. SCWC-13-0000074·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-13-0000074

18-MAR-2015

01:54 PM

SCWC-13-0000074

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

CHRISTOPHER K. ESPIRITU, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0000074; S.P.P. NO. 12-1-0006; C.R. NO. 03-1-0635)

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-

referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court of Appeals at the time the application for writ of certiorari was filed, see Hawai'i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2013); see also Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2012), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/Petitioner­ Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed

March 16, 2015, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the

application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2014) (“The

application shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of

the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or

dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is

extended in accordance with this rule.”).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, March 18, 2015.

Christopher K. Espiritu /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald petitioner pro se

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Espiritu v. State, (haw 2015).

Espiritu v. State (Espiritu v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.