Espire Ads LLC v. Tapp Influencers Corp.
This text of Espire Ads LLC v. Tapp Influencers Corp. (Espire Ads LLC v. Tapp Influencers Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JS-6 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL Case No. CV 23-1620-JFW(DFMx) Date: March 28, 2023 Title: Espire Ads LLC, et al. -v- Tapp Influencers Corp., et al.
PRESENT: HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Shannon Reilly None Present Courtroom Deputy Court Reporter ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS: None None PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE As a result of the parties’ failure to file the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as required by the Court's Order of March 14, 2023, this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. The Scheduling Conference, currently on calendar for April 10, 2023, is VACATED. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 986-88 (9th Cir. 1999); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992). IT IS SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Espire Ads LLC v. Tapp Influencers Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/espire-ads-llc-v-tapp-influencers-corp-cacd-2023.