Espire Ads LLC v. Tapp Influencers Corp.

C.D. California

Espire Ads LLC v. Tapp Influencers Corp.

District Court, C.D. California·Decided March 28, 2023·No. 2:23-cv-01620·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JS-6 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL Case No. CV 23-1620-JFW(DFMx) Date: March 28, 2023 Title: Espire Ads LLC, et al. -v- Tapp Influencers Corp., et al.

PRESENT: HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Shannon Reilly None Present Courtroom Deputy Court Reporter ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS: None None PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE As a result of the parties’ failure to file the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as required by the Court's Order of March 14, 2023, this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. The Scheduling Conference, currently on calendar for April 10, 2023, is VACATED. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 986-88 (9th Cir. 1999); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992). IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JS-6 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL Case No. CV 23-1620-JFW(DFMx) Date: March 28, 2023 Title: Espire Ads LLC, et al. -v- Tapp Influencers Corp., et al.

PRESENT: HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Shannon Reilly None Present Courtroom Deputy Court Reporter ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS: None None PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE As a result of the parties’ failure to file the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as required by the Court's Order of March 14, 2023, this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. The Scheduling Conference, currently on calendar for April 10, 2023, is VACATED. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 986-88 (9th Cir. 1999); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992). IT IS SO ORDERED.

Espire Ads LLC v. Tapp Influencers Corp., (C.D. Cal. 2023).

Pincite

Espire Ads LLC v. Tapp Influencers Corp. (Espire Ads LLC v. Tapp Influencers Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related