Espinoza v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Espinoza v. State

738 S.W.2d 669, 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 677

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 21, 1987·No. Nos. 002-84, 003-84·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

OPINION

MILLER, Judge.

Appellants were convicted by a jury of aggravated robbery. Punishment was assessed by the trial court at twenty years confinement and a fine of ten thousand dollars each. On appeal the Fourteenth Court of Appeals reversed the convictions. Espinoza v. State, 662 S.W.2d 745 (Tx.App.—Houston (14th), 1983).

We have reviewed the issues and find upon reconsideration that this petition was improvidently granted. It is therefore ordered dismissed. See Grigsby v. State, 653 S.W.2d 43 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

MILLER, Judge.

Appellants were convicted by a jury of aggravated robbery. Punishment was assessed by the trial court at twenty years confinement and a fine of ten thousand dollars each. On appeal the Fourteenth Court of Appeals reversed the convictions. Espinoza v. State, 662 S.W.2d 745 (Tx.App.—Houston (14th), 1983).

We have reviewed the issues and find upon reconsideration that this petition was improvidently granted. It is therefore ordered dismissed. See Grigsby v. State, 653 S.W.2d 43 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

Espinoza v. State, 738 S.W.2d 669, 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 677 (Tex. 1987).

Pincite

738 S.W.2d 669 (Espinoza v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related