Espinoza v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Espinoza v. State

738 S.W.2d 669, 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 677

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 21, 1987

DocketNos. 002-84, 003-84

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 738 S.W.2d 669 (Espinoza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Espinoza v. State, 738 S.W.2d 669, 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 677 (Tex. 1987).

Pincite

Opinions

OPINION

MILLER, Judge.

Appellants were convicted by a jury of aggravated robbery. Punishment was assessed by the trial court at twenty years confinement and a fine of ten thousand dollars each. On appeal the Fourteenth Court of Appeals reversed the convictions. Espinoza v. State, 662 S.W.2d 745 (Tx.App.—Houston (14th), 1983).

We have reviewed the issues and find upon reconsideration that this petition was improvidently granted. It is therefore ordered dismissed. See Grigsby v. State, 653 S.W.2d 43 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

MILLER, Judge.

Appellants were convicted by a jury of aggravated robbery. Punishment was assessed by the trial court at twenty years confinement and a fine of ten thousand dollars each. On appeal the Fourteenth Court of Appeals reversed the convictions. Espinoza v. State, 662 S.W.2d 745 (Tx.App.—Houston (14th), 1983).

We have reviewed the issues and find upon reconsideration that this petition was improvidently granted. It is therefore ordered dismissed. See Grigsby v. State, 653 S.W.2d 43 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

738 S.W.2d 669, 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/espinoza-v-state-texcrimapp-1987.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack