Espinoza v. State

706 So. 2d 111, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1647, 1998 WL 75353
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 1998
DocketNo. 97-980
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 706 So. 2d 111 (Espinoza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Espinoza v. State, 706 So. 2d 111, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1647, 1998 WL 75353 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was convicted of manslaughter with a firearm after a jury trial. The record showed that the victim was a Mend of the defendant who was fatally' shot when a pistol being cleaned by the defendant fired when the trigger was accidentally touched and the victim was two to three feet away. We agree that this showi without any additional aggravating circumstances was insufficient to justify the conviction under review. See In the Interest of J.C.D., 598 So.2d 304 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); J.A. v. State, 593 So.2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed with directions to discharge the defendant.1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hardison v. FLORIDA AGR. AND MECHANICAL UNIVERSITY
706 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
706 So. 2d 111, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1647, 1998 WL 75353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/espinoza-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.