Espinoza v. Singletary

686 So. 2d 813, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 307, 1997 WL 35006
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 29, 1997
DocketNo. 96-3228
StatusPublished

This text of 686 So. 2d 813 (Espinoza v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Espinoza v. Singletary, 686 So. 2d 813, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 307, 1997 WL 35006 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We withdraw our prior opinion, 682 So.2d 1226, due to the recent adoption of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j), which was adopted after the issuance of our opinion. We substitute the following in its place:

Denied. See Johnson v. Wainwright, 463 So.2d 207 (Fla.1985); Meyer v. Singletary, 610 So.2d 1329 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

WARNER, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Wainwright
463 So. 2d 207 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
WT Holding, Inc. v. State Agency for Health Care Admin.
682 So. 2d 1224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Meyer v. Singletary
610 So. 2d 1329 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
686 So. 2d 813, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 307, 1997 WL 35006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/espinoza-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1997.