Espinoza v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Espinoza v. City of New York

154 A.D.2d 505

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 16, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 154 A.D.2d 505 (Espinoza v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Espinoza v. City of New York, 154 A.D.2d 505 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for false arrest, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated December 7, 1988, which denied his motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We find, as did the Supreme Court, that the existence of triable issues of fact precludes an award of summary judgment in the plaintiff’s favor. Mangano, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for false arrest, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated December 7, 1988, which denied his motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We find, as did the Supreme Court, that the existence of triable issues of fact precludes an award of summary judgment in the plaintiff’s favor. Mangano, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 A.D.2d 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/espinoza-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1989.