Home/Ninth Circuit/Espinoza-Gutierrez v. Smith

Espinoza-Gutierrez v. Smith

109 F.3d 551, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1975, 97 Daily Journal DAR 3619, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 4983, 1997 WL 118245
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 18, 1997·No. No. 95-35409·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Order; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC AND DISSENT

The panel has unanimously voted to deny appellee’s petition for rehearing. A judge called for a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc, but the suggestion failed to obtain the votes of a majority of the active judges.

The petition for rehearing is therefore DENIED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is REJECTED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Espinoza-Gutierrez v. Smith, 109 F.3d 551, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1975, 97 Daily Journal DAR 3619, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 4983, 1997 WL 118245 (9th Cir. 1997).

109 F.3d 551 (Espinoza-Gutierrez v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oumar Sissoko Julie Sissoko v. Loyda R. Rocha United States of America, Oumar Sissoko, an Individual Julie Sissoko, an Individual v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service Doris Meissner, Commissioner, United States Ins Richard Nmi Rogers, District Director, United States Ins Four Unknown Named Officers, of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service United States U.S. Public Health Services Joseph Chen, Md Unknown Named Employees of the United States Public Health Services, and Loyda R. Rocha, Immigration Inspector, United States Ins
412 F.3d 1021 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Sissoko v. United States
412 F.3d 1021 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1975, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3619 Gabriel Espinoza-Gutierrez v. Richard C. Smith, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service
109 F.3d 551 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)