Espinoza-Gutierrez v. Smith

109 F.3d 551, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1975, 97 Daily Journal DAR 3619, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 4983, 1997 WL 118245
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 18, 1997
DocketNo. 95-35409
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 109 F.3d 551 (Espinoza-Gutierrez v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Espinoza-Gutierrez v. Smith, 109 F.3d 551, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1975, 97 Daily Journal DAR 3619, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 4983, 1997 WL 118245 (9th Cir. 1997).

Opinions

Order; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC AND DISSENT

The panel has unanimously voted to deny appellee’s petition for rehearing. A judge called for a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc, but the suggestion failed to obtain the votes of a majority of the active judges.

The petition for rehearing is therefore DENIED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is REJECTED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 F.3d 551, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1975, 97 Daily Journal DAR 3619, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 4983, 1997 WL 118245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/espinoza-gutierrez-v-smith-ca9-1997.