Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Espinosa v. Vincan Human Resources, Inc.

Espinosa v. Vincan Human Resources, Inc.

697 So. 2d 977, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9034, 1997 WL 441272
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 6, 1997
DocketNo. 97-1345
StatusPublished

This text of 697 So. 2d 977 (Espinosa v. Vincan Human Resources, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Espinosa v. Vincan Human Resources, Inc., 697 So. 2d 977, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9034, 1997 WL 441272 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the appeals referee’s findings of fact are supported by competent, substantial evidence, we affirm the appeals referee’s order denying the claimant’s request for unemployment compensation benefits. Hines v. Department of Labor & Employment Sec., 455 So.2d 1104, 1106 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)(“[An appellate court] must affirm the [appeals] referee’s determination of misconduct if it is supported by competent, substantial evidence in the record.”); Washington v. Burdines, 422 So.2d 932, 933 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)(same).

Accordingly, we affirm the order under review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hines v. Dept. of Labor & Emp. SEC.
455 So. 2d 1104 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Washington v. Burdines
422 So. 2d 932 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
697 So. 2d 977, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9034, 1997 WL 441272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/espinosa-v-vincan-human-resources-inc-fladistctapp-1997.