Espinosa v. Vincan Human Resources, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Espinosa v. Vincan Human Resources, Inc.

697 So. 2d 977, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9034, 1997 WL 441272

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 6, 1997·No. No. 97-1345·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the appeals referee’s findings of fact are supported by competent, substantial evidence, we affirm the appeals referee’s order denying the claimant’s request for unemployment compensation benefits. Hines v. Department of Labor & Employment Sec., 455 So.2d 1104, 1106 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)(“[An appellate court] must affirm the [appeals] referee’s determination of misconduct if it is supported by competent, substantial evidence in the record.”); Washington v. Burdines, 422 So.2d 932, 933 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)(same).

Accordingly, we affirm the order under review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because the appeals referee’s findings of fact are supported by competent, substantial evidence, we affirm the appeals referee’s order denying the claimant’s request for unemployment compensation benefits. Hines v. Department of Labor & Employment Sec., 455 So.2d 1104, 1106 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)(“[An appellate court] must affirm the [appeals] referee’s determination of misconduct if it is supported by competent, substantial evidence in the record.”); Washington v. Burdines, 422 So.2d 932, 933 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)(same).

Accordingly, we affirm the order under review.

Espinosa v. Vincan Human Resources, Inc., 697 So. 2d 977, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9034, 1997 WL 441272 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

697 So. 2d 977 (Espinosa v. Vincan Human Resources, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related