Espinosa v. State
561 So. 2d 597, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2158, 1990 WL 37418
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 3, 1990
DocketNo. 88-918
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 561 So. 2d 597 (Espinosa v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Espinosa v. State, 561 So. 2d 597, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2158, 1990 WL 37418 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
Opinion
We conclude that there was probable cause to arrest the defendant; that the trial court correctly denied the motion to suppress the defendant’s post-Miranda
Affirmed.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fricke v. State
561 So. 2d 597 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
561 So. 2d 597, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2158, 1990 WL 37418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/espinosa-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.