Espinosa v. Burger King Corp.
134 S. Ct. 467, 187 L. Ed. 2d 277, 571 U.S. 950, 82 U.S.L.W. 3214, 2013 WL 5610434, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7486
This text of 134 S. Ct. 467 (Espinosa v. Burger King Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Espinosa v. Burger King Corp., 134 S. Ct. 467, 187 L. Ed. 2d 277, 571 U.S. 950, 82 U.S.L.W. 3214, 2013 WL 5610434, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7486 (U.S. 2013).
Opinion
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner allowed until November 5, 2013, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
134 S. Ct. 467, 187 L. Ed. 2d 277, 571 U.S. 950, 82 U.S.L.W. 3214, 2013 WL 5610434, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/espinosa-v-burger-king-corp-scotus-2013.