Espino v. Nash & Manchester
7 Hill & Den. 167
This text of 7 Hill & Den. 167 (Espino v. Nash & Manchester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Espino v. Nash & Manchester, 7 Hill & Den. 167 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).
Opinion
[168]*168 By the Court,
As a default for not joining in demurrer had not been entered, the plaintiff had a clear right to amend as against the defendant Nash; and as he could not exercise that right without affecting both of the defendants, I think Manchester as well as Nash must answer the amended declaration. (Thomas v. Allen, 2 Wend. 618.)
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Thomas v. Allen & German
2 Wend. 618 (New York Supreme Court, 1829)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 Hill & Den. 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/espino-v-nash-manchester-nysupct-1844.