Espinal v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Espinal v. City of New York

279 A.D.2d 503, 720 N.Y.S.2d 351

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 16, 2001·Published

Opinion

In two related actions to recover damages for personal injuries, which were joined for trial, Brooklyn Union Gas Company, a defendant in both actions, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated February 22, 2000, which denied its motion to vacate the plaintiffs’ notes of issue filed in each action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion to vacate the plaintiffs’ notes of issue (see, Mitchell v New York Hosp., 61 NY2d 208, 214; DeSilva v Rosenberg, 261 AD2d 503; City of Mount Vernon v Lexington Ins. Co., 232 AD2d 358). Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In two related actions to recover damages for personal injuries, which were joined for trial, Brooklyn Union Gas Company, a defendant in both actions, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated February 22, 2000, which denied its motion to vacate the plaintiffs’ notes of issue filed in each action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion to vacate the plaintiffs’ notes of issue (see, Mitchell v New York Hosp., 61 NY2d 208, 214; DeSilva v Rosenberg, 261 AD2d 503; City of Mount Vernon v Lexington Ins. Co., 232 AD2d 358). Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Espinal v. City of New York, 279 A.D.2d 503, 720 N.Y.S.2d 351 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

279 A.D.2d 503 (Espinal v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related