Espinal v. City of New York
This text of 279 A.D.2d 503 (Espinal v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In two related actions to recover damages for personal injuries, which were joined for trial, Brooklyn Union Gas Company, a defendant in both actions, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated February 22, 2000, which denied its motion to vacate the plaintiffs’ notes of issue filed in each action.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion to vacate the plaintiffs’ notes of issue (see, Mitchell v New York Hosp., 61 NY2d 208, 214; DeSilva v Rosenberg, 261 AD2d 503; City of Mount Vernon v Lexington Ins. Co., 232 AD2d 358). Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 A.D.2d 503, 720 N.Y.S.2d 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/espinal-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2001.