Espin v. Warden of the Maryland Penitentiary

203 A.2d 906, 236 Md. 625, 1964 Md. LEXIS 940
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided October 21, 1964·No. App. No. 45·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief by Judge Prendergast in the court below. The opinion filed deals adequately with all points raised except the first, that he was illegally arrested and searched, and that the victim’s money belt and contents, found on Espin, was put in evidence in violation of his constitutional rights. We think the court mistakenly relied on Sawyer v. Warden, 234 Md. 629, in which case Espin’s companion claimed an illegal search when nothing was found on him, and also on Slater v. Warden, 233 Md. 609, where a search was not involved, but only an arrest. However, the facts found in Sawyer, and in Espin v. State, 230 Md. 298, demonstrate that the arrest of both was upon probable cause, so that the court did not err in refusing post conviction relief to Espin.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Espin v. Warden of the Maryland Penitentiary, 203 A.2d 906, 236 Md. 625, 1964 Md. LEXIS 940 (Md. 1964).

203 A.2d 906 (Espin v. Warden of the Maryland Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Espin v. State
186 A.2d 589 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1962)
Slater v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
195 A.2d 675 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1963)
Sawyer v. Warden of the Maryland Penitentiary
199 A.2d 616 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1964)