Espanioly v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

768 So. 2d 1230, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12707, 2000 WL 1471619
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 4, 2000·No. No. 3D00-1177·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nahi J. Espanioly appeals from an order of the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission dismissing her case for lack of jurisdiction. For the following reasons, we reverse.

The appeals referee and Espanioly dispute whether she timely filed an appeal on October 14, 1999. The Commission ordered an evidentiary hearing solely on the issue of the appeal’s timeliness. Espanioly produced as evidence of appealing timely a fax confirmation of her October 14, 1999, Request to Reopen the case. Nevertheless, the Commission dismissed her appeal for lack of jurisdiction, finding that it was filed untimely.

Espanioly’s submission of evidence of the October 14, 1999, facsimile confirmation was sufficient to establish that her appeal was timely; therefore, the Commission has jurisdiction, and the appeal should be reinstated.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Espanioly v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 768 So. 2d 1230, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12707, 2000 WL 1471619 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

768 So. 2d 1230 (Espanioly v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stanley v. State of Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
864 So. 2d 1160 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Stanley v. STATE, UNEMP. APPEALS COM'N
864 So. 2d 1160 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Nickolan-Barron v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
859 So. 2d 594 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)