Espana v. Redneris

661 So. 2d 1295, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11420, 1995 WL 638268
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 1, 1995·No. No. 95-1953·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the order of the trial court requiring the petitioner in a personal injury action to appear in Dade County for deposition or have his pleadings struck. The defendant is a resident of Guatemala and did not plead for affirmative relief in the proceedings below. There is no evidence in the record that he is evading discovery. The general rule is that a defendant not requesting affirmative relief is not required to travel to the forum of the action for a discovery deposition absent extraordinary circumstances. See, e.g., Patterson v. Venne, 594 So.2d 331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Godshall v. Hessen, 227 So.2d 506 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969), cert, denied, 237 So.2d 530 (Fla.1970). This case does not present extraordinary circumstances to deviate from the general rule.

The order requiring petitioner to appear for a discovery deposition in Dade County is quashed.

WARNER, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Espana v. Redneris, 661 So. 2d 1295, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11420, 1995 WL 638268 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

661 So. 2d 1295 (Espana v. Redneris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Polselli v. Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A.
133 So. 3d 1172 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
CVS Caremark Corp. v. Latour
109 So. 3d 1232 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Ayer v. Bush
696 So. 2d 1333 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)