Esmurdoc v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
934 So. 2d 486, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15408, 2004 WL 2347566
Opinion
As DaimlerChrysler Corporation is neither a party to the contract containing the arbitration clause nor a third-party beneficiary of the arbitration clause, we reverse the trial court’s order which stayed the suit and referred it to arbitration. The case is remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Esmurdoc v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 934 So. 2d 486, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15408, 2004 WL 2347566 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
934 So. 2d 486 (Esmurdoc v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.