Esmeralda Dodson v. Watermark at Timbergate B, LLC and Thompson Thrift Development, Inc., D/B/A Watermark Residential
This text of Esmeralda Dodson v. Watermark at Timbergate B, LLC and Thompson Thrift Development, Inc., D/B/A Watermark Residential (Esmeralda Dodson v. Watermark at Timbergate B, LLC and Thompson Thrift Development, Inc., D/B/A Watermark Residential) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-22-00129-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
ESMERALDA DODSON, Appellant,
v.
WATERMARK AT TIMBERGATE B, LLC AND THOMPSON THRIFT DEVELOPMENT, INC., D/B/A WATERMARK RESIDENTIAL, Appellees.
On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 of Nueces County, Texas.
ORDER OF ABATEMENT
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina Order Per Curiam
By two issues, appellant Esmeralda Dodson appeals the trial court’s granting of
summary judgment in favor of appellees Watermark at Timbergate B, LLC and Thompson
Thrift Development, Inc., d/b/a Watermark Residential in this premises liability case. The parties state that the relevant summary judgment order was signed on March 1, 2022, but
the order in fact indicates it was signed by the trial court on March 1, 2021.
Given the jurisdictional implications of the order’s date, we abate this appeal to the
trial court with directions to clarify and, if appropriate, correct its summary judgment order
to reflect the date on which it was signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b), 26.1, 44.4(b);
Estate of Hoskins, 501 S.W.3d 295, 301 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2016, no
pet.) (“An untimely notice of appeal . . . does not invoke the jurisdiction of this Court.”).
Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court. On
remand, the trial court is ORDERED to inform this Court by written explanation as to
whether it signed its summary judgment order on March 1, 2021, or March 1, 2022. The
trial court shall cause a supplemental clerk’s record containing the requested clarification
and, if necessary, a corrected order to be filed with the Clerk of this Court within TEN
days from the date of this order. The appeal will be reinstated upon receipt of the
supplemental clerk’s record and upon further order of this Court.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed on the 20th day of October, 2022.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Esmeralda Dodson v. Watermark at Timbergate B, LLC and Thompson Thrift Development, Inc., D/B/A Watermark Residential, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/esmeralda-dodson-v-watermark-at-timbergate-b-llc-and-thompson-thrift-texapp-2022.