Home/Third Circuit/Eskimo Pie Corporation v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Eskimo Pie Corporation v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

153 F.2d 301
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedFebruary 1, 1946
Docket9018
StatusPublished

This text of 153 F.2d 301 (Eskimo Pie Corporation v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eskimo Pie Corporation v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 153 F.2d 301 (3d Cir. 1946).

Opinion

153 F.2d 301 (1946)

ESKIMO PIE CORPORATION, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 9018.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued January 21, 1946.
Decided February 1, 1946.

Elmer M. Cunningham, of Richmond, Va. (Walter L. Rice, of Richmond, Va., on the brief), for petitioner.

Harold C. Wilkenfeld, of Washington, D. C. (Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and Helen R. Carloss, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., on the brief), for respondent.

Before BIGGS, GOODRICH, and McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed upon the opinion by Judge Arundell, 4 T.C. 669.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 F.2d 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eskimo-pie-corporation-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca3-1946.