Eskew v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Eskew v. State

1931 OK CR 192, 298 P. 308, 50 Okla. Crim. 369, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 182

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 18, 1931

DocketNo. A-7904.

StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK CR 192 (Eskew v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eskew v. State, 1931 OK CR 192, 298 P. 308, 50 Okla. Crim. 369, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 182 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVENPORT, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Love county of assault with intent to rape, and was sentenced to serve a term of three years in the state reformatory at Granite, Okla.

The case was tried in December, 1929, and the appeal lodged in this court in June, 1930. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, nor was there any appearance for oral argument at the time the case was submitted.

Where an appeal is prosecuted to this court, and no brief in support of the petition in error is filed, and no appearance for oral argument made, this court will examine the record for jurisdictional errors, and, if none appear, the case will be affirmed.

CHAPPELL and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVENPORT, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Love county of assault with intent to rape, and was sentenced to serve a term of three years in the state reformatory at Granite, Okla.

The case was tried in December, 1929, and the appeal lodged in this court in June, 1930. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, nor was there any appearance for oral argument at the time the case was submitted.

Where an appeal is prosecuted to this court, and no brief in support of the petition in error is filed, and no appearance for oral argument made, this court will examine the record for jurisdictional errors, and, if none appear, the case will be affirmed.

CHAPPELL and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1931 OK CR 192, 298 P. 308, 50 Okla. Crim. 369, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eskew-v-state-oklacrimapp-1931.