Eskew v. Camp

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Eskew v. Camp

204 S.E.2d 465, 130 Ga. App. 779, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1260

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 5, 1974

Docket48924

StatusPublished

This text of 204 S.E.2d 465 (Eskew v. Camp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eskew v. Camp, 204 S.E.2d 465, 130 Ga. App. 779, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1260 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Clark, Judge.

Plaintiff, a building contractor, sued defendant for $738 as the balance due on a contract for furnishing labor and materials used for improvements on defendant’s realty. Defendant’s answer consisted of a denial, a plea of failure of consideration, and a counterclaim for breach of contract. This cross action sought compensatory damages of $790, punitive damages of $5,000, and attorney fees of $2,500 for stubborn litigiousness. The claim for attorney fees was stricken on motion but the court declined to strike the claim for punitive damages. The jury awarded defendant $790 actual damages and $2,500 in punitive damages on his counterclaim. This appeal is by plaintiff from the judgment rendered upon this verdict.

Defendant’s counterclaim sought to recover for damages sustained as a result of plaintiffs breach of contract. As defendant’s claim thus arose ex contractu and not ex delicto it was error to render a judgment for punitive damages against the plaintiff. Code § 20-1405. See also Nichols v. Williams Pontiac, 95 Ga. App. 752 (5) (98 SE2d 659) and Cohen v. Garland, 119 Ga. App. 333, 340 *780 (167 SE2d 599).

Submitted January 8, 1974 Decided February 5, 1974. Linus L. Zukas, for appellant. Goodman & Hudnall, Craig R. Goodman, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed subject to appellee deducting the punitive damages of $2,500; otherwise reversed.

Bell, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark, Judge.

Plaintiff, a building contractor, sued defendant for $738 as the balance due on a contract for furnishing labor and materials used for improvements on defendant’s realty. Defendant’s answer consisted of a denial, a plea of failure of consideration, and a counterclaim for breach of contract. This cross action sought compensatory damages of $790, punitive damages of $5,000, and attorney fees of $2,500 for stubborn litigiousness. The claim for attorney fees was stricken on motion but the court declined to strike the claim for punitive damages. The jury awarded defendant $790 actual damages and $2,500 in punitive damages on his counterclaim. This appeal is by plaintiff from the judgment rendered upon this verdict.

Defendant’s counterclaim sought to recover for damages sustained as a result of plaintiffs breach of contract. As defendant’s claim thus arose ex contractu and not ex delicto it was error to render a judgment for punitive damages against the plaintiff. Code § 20-1405. See also Nichols v. Williams Pontiac, 95 Ga. App. 752 (5) (98 SE2d 659) and Cohen v. Garland, 119 Ga. App. 333, 340 *780 (167 SE2d 599).

Submitted January 8, 1974 Decided February 5, 1974. Linus L. Zukas, for appellant. Goodman & Hudnall, Craig R. Goodman, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed subject to appellee deducting the punitive damages of $2,500; otherwise reversed.

Bell, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 S.E.2d 465, 130 Ga. App. 779, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eskew-v-camp-gactapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack