Eskenazi v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eskenazi v. City of New York

21 A.D.2d 786, 251 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3632

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1964

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 21 A.D.2d 786 (Eskenazi v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eskenazi v. City of New York, 21 A.D.2d 786, 251 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3632 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding by an infant pursuant to statute (General Municipal Law, § 50-e, sufod. 5), for leave to serve a late notice of claim for damages for personal injury, the New York City Housing Authority appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 29, 1964, which granted the application. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. The time of the infant to serve the notice of claim is extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur; Christ, J., concurs for affirmance by reason of the majority holding of this court in Matter of Pandoliano v. New York City Tr. Auth. (17 A D 2d 951), but adheres to the views expressed by him in the dissenting opinion in that case and to the views expressed by the majority in Matter of Goglas v. New York City Housing Auth. (13 A D 2d 939, affd. 11 N Y 2d 680).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding by an infant pursuant to statute (General Municipal Law, § 50-e, sufod. 5), for leave to serve a late notice of claim for damages for personal injury, the New York City Housing Authority appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 29, 1964, which granted the application. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. The time of the infant to serve the notice of claim is extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur; Christ, J., concurs for affirmance by reason of the majority holding of this court in Matter of Pandoliano v. New York City Tr. Auth. (17 A D 2d 951), but adheres to the views expressed by him in the dissenting opinion in that case and to the views expressed by the majority in Matter of Goglas v. New York City Housing Auth. (13 A D 2d 939, affd. 11 N Y 2d 680).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A.D.2d 786, 251 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eskenazi-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack