Eskelin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
This text of Eskelin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Eskelin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-1543V (not to be published)
***************************** TINA L. ESKELIN, * November 21, 2017 * * Joint Stipulation of Dismissal; Petitioner, * Rule 21(a); No Judgment; Order * Concluding Proceedings v. * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * *****************************
ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS
On November 20, 2017, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a)(1)(B), the parties filed a joint stipulation stating that above-captioned case should be dismissed.
Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a)(3), the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Special Master
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Eskelin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eskelin-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2018.