Eskelin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided January 11, 2018·No. 16-1543·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-1543V (not to be published)

***************************** TINA L. ESKELIN, * November 21, 2017 * * Joint Stipulation of Dismissal; Petitioner, * Rule 21(a); No Judgment; Order * Concluding Proceedings v. * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * *****************************

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS

On November 20, 2017, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a)(1)(B), the parties filed a joint stipulation stating that above-captioned case should be dismissed.

Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a)(3), the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Special Master

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eskelin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2018).

Eskelin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Eskelin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.