ESIC Capital, Inc. v. Parachute Designs, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

ESIC Capital, Inc. v. Parachute Designs, Ltd.

102 A.D.2d 861, 477 N.Y.S.2d 304, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19064

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 102 A.D.2d 861 (ESIC Capital, Inc. v. Parachute Designs, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ESIC Capital, Inc. v. Parachute Designs, Ltd., 102 A.D.2d 861, 477 N.Y.S.2d 304, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19064 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, defendants appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Vitale, J.), dated October 26,1983, which denied their motion to restore the action to the Trial Calendar, and (2) an order of the same court, dated November 30, 1983, which (a) denied defendants’ motion which sought to reargue the prior motion to restore, and (b) denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint against defendants Susan Rosner, Spencer Kent and Sondra Kent on the ground of plaintiff’s alleged release, f Order dated October 26,1983, affirmed. No opinion. 1 Appeal from so much of the order dated November 30, 1983 as denied reargument dismissed. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument. H Order dated November 30, 1983 otherwise affirmed. No opinion. 1 Plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs. Bracken, J. P., O’Connor, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, defendants appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Vitale, J.), dated October 26,1983, which denied their motion to restore the action to the Trial Calendar, and (2) an order of the same court, dated November 30, 1983, which (a) denied defendants’ motion which sought to reargue the prior motion to restore, and (b) denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint against defendants Susan Rosner, Spencer Kent and Sondra Kent on the ground of plaintiff’s alleged release, f Order dated October 26,1983, affirmed. No opinion. 1 Appeal from so much of the order dated November 30, 1983 as denied reargument dismissed. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument. H Order dated November 30, 1983 otherwise affirmed. No opinion. 1 Plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs. Bracken, J. P., O’Connor, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 A.D.2d 861, 477 N.Y.S.2d 304, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/esic-capital-inc-v-parachute-designs-ltd-nyappdiv-1984.