Eshlibi v. Consolidated Box Mfg.
This text of 962 So. 2d 377 (Eshlibi v. Consolidated Box Mfg.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Abubaker ESHLIBI, Appellant,
v.
CONSOLIDATED BOX MANUFACTURING and CNA Insurance, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
John J. Rahaim, II, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Bonnie J. Murdoch and Nicholas J. Elder, Jacksonville, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
When a represented claimant enters into a lump-sum settlement with an employer and carrier, section 440.20(11)(c), Florida Statutes (2006), only requires JCC approval of the attorney's fees paid by the claimant to the claimant's attorney. See § 440.20(11)(c), Fla. Stat. (2006). A JCC lacks statutory authority to deny the attorney's fees based upon costs charged to the *378 claimant. Accordingly, the order is REVERSED.
KAHN AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
BENTON, J., concurs in result.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
962 So. 2d 377, 2007 WL 2174854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eshlibi-v-consolidated-box-mfg-fladistctapp-2007.