Eshleman v. Union Stock Yards Co.
70 A. 899, 222 Pa. 20, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 652
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 2, 1908
DocketAppeal, No. 263
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 70 A. 899 (Eshleman v. Union Stock Yards Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Eshleman v. Union Stock Yards Co., 70 A. 899, 222 Pa. 20, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 652 (Pa. 1908).
Opinion
We are of opinion that the testimony offered at the trial did not establish the plaintiff’s right to recover, and that a nonsuit was properly entered for reasons stated in the opinion of the learned trial judge.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Crowley v. Service Garage
8 Pa. D. & C. 559 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1927)
Teller Et Ux. v. Hood
81 Pa. Super. 443 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)
Donovan v. Connecticut Co.
84 A. 288 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1912)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
70 A. 899, 222 Pa. 20, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eshleman-v-union-stock-yards-co-pa-1908.