Eshleman v. Union Stock Yards Co.
70 A. 899, 222 Pa. 20, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 652
Opinion
We are of opinion that the testimony offered at the trial did not establish the plaintiff’s right to recover, and that a nonsuit was properly entered for reasons stated in the opinion of the learned trial judge.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eshleman v. Union Stock Yards Co., 70 A. 899, 222 Pa. 20, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 652 (Pa. 1908).
70 A. 899 (Eshleman v. Union Stock Yards Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crowley v. Service Garage
8 Pa. D. & C. 559 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1927)
Teller Et Ux. v. Hood
81 Pa. Super. 443 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)
Donovan v. Connecticut Co.
84 A. 288 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1912)