Eshelle Saenz v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 27, 2016
Docket13-16-00018-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Eshelle Saenz v. State (Eshelle Saenz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eshelle Saenz v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-16-00018-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

ESHELLE SAENZ, Appellant,

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On Appeal from the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

ORDER ABATING APPEAL Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court regarding the preparation of the reporter’s record in

this cause. Appellant’s counsel has failed to request a reporter’s record. The reporter

was advised that the appellant no longer wished to pursue the appeal but a motion to

dismiss has not been filed with this Court. This sequence of events requires us to effectuate our responsibility to avoid further

delay and to preserve the parties' rights. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a)(1). Accordingly,

this appeal is ABATED and the cause REMANDED to the trial court.

Upon remand, the judge of the trial court shall immediately cause notice to be given

and conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant has abandoned her appeal. If it

is determined that appellant has not abandoned her appeal, the court shall further

determine if appellant’s attorney of record continues to represent appellant and will

diligently pursue this appeal.

The court shall further determine if the reporter's record, or any part thereof, has

been lost or destroyed, and shall make appropriate findings under Tex. R. App. P. 34.6(f),

if necessary. Otherwise, the court shall determine what steps are necessary to ensure

the prompt preparation of a reporter's record, and shall enter any orders required to avoid

further delay and to preserve the parties' rights.

The trial court shall prepare and file its findings and orders and cause them to be

included in a supplemental clerk's record which should be submitted to the Clerk of this

Court within thirty days from the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed this the 27th day of May, 2016.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Eshelle Saenz v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eshelle-saenz-v-state-texapp-2016.