Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Eshel v. Fleet Bank

Eshel v. Fleet Bank

279 A.D.2d 281, 718 N.Y.S.2d 825, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 95
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 9, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 279 A.D.2d 281 (Eshel v. Fleet Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eshel v. Fleet Bank, 279 A.D.2d 281, 718 N.Y.S.2d 825, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 95 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered on or about July 25, 2000, which, in an action for fraud and misappropriation of investment monies, granted defendant-respondent’s motion to disqualify plaintiffs’ attorneys, unanimously affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in Bassman v Blackstone Assocs. (279 AD2d 280 [decided herewith]). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Andrias, Ellerin and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bassman v. Blackstone Associates
279 A.D.2d 280 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D.2d 281, 718 N.Y.S.2d 825, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eshel-v-fleet-bank-nyappdiv-2001.