ESE Funding SPC Ltd. v. Stanley
68 A.D.3d 676, 891 N.Y.2d 400
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 2009·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
[677]*677Plaintiff negotiated an arm’s length commercial contract with defendant Morgan Stanley Altabridge to purchase defendants’ financial risk associated with a third-party security transaction. Plaintiff has made no showing that any of these defendants had a “special relationship” with plaintiff (cf. Kimmell v Schaefer, 89 NY2d 257 [1996]).
We have reviewed plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ESE Funding SPC Ltd. v. Stanley, 68 A.D.3d 676, 891 N.Y.2d 400 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).
68 A.D.3d 676 (ESE Funding SPC Ltd. v. Stanley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
EXRP 14 Holdings LLC v. LS-14 Ave LLC
2024 NY Slip Op 03325 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
HSH Nordbank AG v. UBS AG
95 A.D.3d 185 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
MBIA Insurance v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
87 A.D.3d 287 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)