Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Escoto v. Leonard Meiselman, Inc.

Escoto v. Leonard Meiselman, Inc.

282 A.D.2d 429, 722 N.Y.S.2d 423, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3325
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 2, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D.2d 429 (Escoto v. Leonard Meiselman, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Escoto v. Leonard Meiselman, Inc., 282 A.D.2d 429, 722 N.Y.S.2d 423, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3325 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—In an action to recover overtime pay, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Carter, J.), dated July 27, 2000, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the action as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs action to recover overtime pay allegedly due and owing under 29 USC § 207 (see, Hornstein v Negev Airbase Constr., 110 AD2d 884; Gallegos v Brandeis School, 189 FRD 256) was properly dismissed as time-barred (see, 29 USC § 255; Sauerzopf v North Am. Cement Corp., 301 NY 158). Bracken, P. J., O’Brien, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sauerzopf v. North American Cement Corp.
93 N.E.2d 617 (New York Court of Appeals, 1950)
Hoenstein v. Negev Airbase Constructors
110 A.D.2d 884 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 A.D.2d 429, 722 N.Y.S.2d 423, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/escoto-v-leonard-meiselman-inc-nyappdiv-2001.