Escofil v. Pennsylvania

462 U.S. 1117, 103 S. Ct. 3084, 77 L. Ed. 2d 1346, 51 U.S.L.W. 3883, 1983 U.S. LEXIS 504
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 13, 1983·No. No. 82-6193·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Pa. Motion of appellant for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Appellant is allowed until July 5,1983, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 45(a) and to submit a jurisdictional statement in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

Justice Rehnquist and Justice O’Connor would award appellee damages pursuant to Rule 49.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Escofil v. Pennsylvania, 462 U.S. 1117, 103 S. Ct. 3084, 77 L. Ed. 2d 1346, 51 U.S.L.W. 3883, 1983 U.S. LEXIS 504 (1983).

462 U.S. 1117 (Escofil v. Pennsylvania) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related