Escofil v. Pennsylvania
462 U.S. 1117, 103 S. Ct. 3084, 77 L. Ed. 2d 1346, 51 U.S.L.W. 3883, 1983 U.S. LEXIS 504
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 13, 1983
DocketNo. 82-6193
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 462 U.S. 1117 (Escofil v. Pennsylvania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Escofil v. Pennsylvania, 462 U.S. 1117, 103 S. Ct. 3084, 77 L. Ed. 2d 1346, 51 U.S.L.W. 3883, 1983 U.S. LEXIS 504 (1983).
Opinion
Sup. Ct. Pa. Motion of appellant for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Appellant is allowed until July 5,1983, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 45(a) and to submit a jurisdictional statement in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Talamini, Administratrix of the Estate of Talamini v. Allstate Insurance Co.
470 U.S. 1067 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
462 U.S. 1117, 103 S. Ct. 3084, 77 L. Ed. 2d 1346, 51 U.S.L.W. 3883, 1983 U.S. LEXIS 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/escofil-v-pennsylvania-scotus-1983.