Escofil v. Com.
452 A.2d 1012, 499 Pa. 207
This text of 452 A.2d 1012 (Escofil v. Com.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Escofil v. Com., 452 A.2d 1012, 499 Pa. 207 (Pa. 1982).
Opinion
Noel Tancred ESCOFIL, Appellant
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Noel Escofil, in pro per.
Robert Patrick Coyne, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before O'BRIEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, NIX, LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT and HUTCHINSON, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Order affirmed. 46 Pa.Cmwlth. 475, 406 A.2d 850.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Escofil v. Commonwealth
406 A.2d 850 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Escofil v. Commonwealth
452 A.2d 1012 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
452 A.2d 1012, 499 Pa. 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/escofil-v-com-pa-1982.