Escobar v. State
This text of 985 So. 2d 62 (Escobar v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ruben Dario ESCOBAR, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Leonard R. Ross, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Michel v. State, 752 So.2d 6 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (holding that vehicular homicide victim's conduct is irrelevant unless it was sole proximate cause of homicide or unless there was some reason why it would be unjust or unfair to impose criminal liability).
GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
985 So. 2d 62, 2008 WL 2465569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/escobar-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.