Escobar v. State

572 So. 2d 517, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4945, 1990 WL 95488
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 10, 1990
DocketNo. 90-319
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 572 So. 2d 517 (Escobar v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Escobar v. State, 572 So. 2d 517, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4945, 1990 WL 95488 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s motion for post conviction relief was properly denied as untimely filed beyond the two year limitation provided by Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lawyers Title Ins. Co. v. Synergism One Corp.
572 So. 2d 517 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
572 So. 2d 517, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4945, 1990 WL 95488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/escobar-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.