Escobar v. Holder

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Escobar v. Holder. Read the opinion of the Court — 567 F.3d 466
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 10, 2009·No. 07-72843·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KATTIA GUADALUPE ESCOBAR,  Nos. 07-72843 Petitioner, 08-71777 v.  Agency No. ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney A 75-504-052 General, ORDER Respondent.  Filed July 10, 2009

Before: Jerome Farris, Susan P. Graber, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion in Escobar v. Holder, 567 F.3d 466 (9th Cir. 2009), is vacated.

The Respondent’s petition for rehearing is dismissed as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9061 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Escobar v. Holder, (9th Cir. 2009).

Escobar v. Holder (Escobar v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Escobar v. Holder
567 F.3d 466 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)