Escobar v. Genovese

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Escobar v. Genovese

40 A.D.2d 861, 337 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3294

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 27, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 861 (Escobar v. Genovese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Escobar v. Genovese, 40 A.D.2d 861, 337 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3294 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

—In consolidated negligence actions to recover damages for personal and property damages, defendants in Action No. 1 appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered March 21, 1972 against them and in favor of plaintiff in Action No. 1 upon the issue of liability, upon the trial court’s decision (1) setting aside a jury verdict insofar as it was in favor of said defendants upon that issue and (2) granting such judgment to said plaintiff notwithstanding said verdict. Interlocutory judgment reversed, with costs, and verdict insofar as it was in favor of defendants in Action No. 1 reinstated. In our opinion, a fair interpretation of the facts adduced supports the verdict in favor of defendants in Action No. 1. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In consolidated negligence actions to recover damages for personal and property damages, defendants in Action No. 1 appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered March 21, 1972 against them and in favor of plaintiff in Action No. 1 upon the issue of liability, upon the trial court’s decision (1) setting aside a jury verdict insofar as it was in favor of said defendants upon that issue and (2) granting such judgment to said plaintiff notwithstanding said verdict. Interlocutory judgment reversed, with costs, and verdict insofar as it was in favor of defendants in Action No. 1 reinstated. In our opinion, a fair interpretation of the facts adduced supports the verdict in favor of defendants in Action No. 1. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 861, 337 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/escobar-v-genovese-nyappdiv-1972.