Escobar v. Alliance Credit Union
This text of Escobar v. Alliance Credit Union (Escobar v. Alliance Credit Union) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION JUSTIN ISREAL ESCOBAR, Plaintiff, V. No. 5:23-CV-125-H-BQ ALLIANCE CREDIT UNION, Defendant. ORDER The United States Magistrate Judge issued Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) that this case be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, failure to effect service, and failure to comply with Court orders. Dkt. No. 9. No objections were filed, and the plaintiff has taken no action in this case since June 28, 2023. See Dkt. No. 6. Where no specific objections are filed within the 14-day period, the Court reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings, conclusions, and recommendations only for plain error. Serrano v. Customs & Border Patrol, U.S. Customs & Border Prot., 975 F.3d 488, 502 (Sth Cir. 2020). The District Court has reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adopts the FCR. The plaintiffs claims against the defendant are dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, failure to effect service, and failure to comply with Court orders. So ordered on December (3, 2023.
TAME WESLEY HENDEE aap STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Escobar v. Alliance Credit Union, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/escobar-v-alliance-credit-union-txnd-2023.