Escobar v. 271 Mulberry St. Co., LLC

2017 NY Slip Op 1121, 147 A.D.3d 473, 47 N.Y.S.3d 19
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 10, 2017·No. 2725 306873/12 84204/12·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered June 17, 2015, which denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment as to liability on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court should have considered plaintiff’s untimely motion for partial summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240 (1), as the sudden death of plaintiff’s counsel’s mother constituted good cause for the seven-day delay in moving for summary judgment. Nonetheless, the motion must be denied on the merits. While plaintiff made a prima facie showing that his injuries were proximately caused by the failure of a safety device to afford him proper protection from an elevation-related risk, defendants-respondents have raised issues of fact as to whether plaintiff “had adequate safety devices available; that he knew both that they were available and that he was expected to use them; that he chose for no good reason not to do so; and that had he not made that choice he would not have been injured” (Auriemma v Biltmore Theatre, LLC, 82 AD3d 1, 10 [1st Dept 2011], quoting Cahill v Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Auth., 4 NY3d 35, 40 [2004]).

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Mazzarelli, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Escobar v. 271 Mulberry St. Co., LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 1121, 147 A.D.3d 473, 47 N.Y.S.3d 19 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 1121 (Escobar v. 271 Mulberry St. Co., LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mauro v. Ostrowski
2018 NY Slip Op 6523 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)