Escobar-Grijalva v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
This text of 213 F.3d 1221 (Escobar-Grijalva v. Immigration & Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The opinion filed on March 24, 2000 is amended as follows:
Slip opinion, p. 3469, sec. [4]. After ¶ 1 [206 F.3d at 1335, following the fifth paragraph], add:
The INS contends that Escobar did not raise the denial of her statutory right to counsel in a timely fashion. But her claim of counsel so ineffective in assisting her that it deprived the administrative proceeding of due process encompassed the denial of the statutory right; the latter denial was the foundation of what followed. We decide the appeal on this narrower, statutory basis. See Rios-Berrios v. INS, 776 F.2d 859, 862 (9th Cir.1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
213 F.3d 1221, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 17714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/escobar-grijalva-v-immigration-naturalization-service-ca9-2000.