Escobar-Grajales v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Escobar-Grajales v. State

164 So. 3d 791, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8189, 2015 WL 2458127

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 29, 2015

DocketNo. 5D14-3890

StatusPublished

This text of 164 So. 3d 791 (Escobar-Grajales v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Escobar-Grajales v. State, 164 So. 3d 791, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8189, 2015 WL 2458127 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jhoan Escobar-Grajales appeals the summary denial of his motion and amended motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. As the State concedes, the first ground for relief set forth in Esco-bar-Grajales’s motion is facially sufficient and not conclusively rebutted by the record. Accordingly, Escobar-Grajales is entitled to a hearing on that claim. We affirm, without comment, the trial court’s order denying relief On the remainder of the asserted claims.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in Part; REMANDED.

TORPY, C.J., ORFINGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jhoan Escobar-Grajales appeals the summary denial of his motion and amended motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. As the State concedes, the first ground for relief set forth in Esco-bar-Grajales’s motion is facially sufficient and not conclusively rebutted by the record. Accordingly, Escobar-Grajales is entitled to a hearing on that claim. We affirm, without comment, the trial court’s order denying relief On the remainder of the asserted claims.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in Part; REMANDED.

TORPY, C.J., ORFINGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 So. 3d 791, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8189, 2015 WL 2458127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/escobar-grajales-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.