Esco Corp. v. Tru-Rol Co.

489 F.2d 699, 180 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 290
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 2, 1974
DocketNos. 73-1836, 73-1837
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 489 F.2d 699 (Esco Corp. v. Tru-Rol Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Esco Corp. v. Tru-Rol Co., 489 F.2d 699, 180 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 290 (4th Cir. 1974).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Esco Corporation sued the Tru-Rol Company for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 2,919,506 covering a type of excavating teeth used on heavy machinery. The district court found that claims 1, 3, 8, 15, 20, 21 and 28 of the patent were valid and infringed. The court granted an injunction prohibiting Tru-Rol from further infringement and awarded actual damages, costs, and reasonable attorney’s fees to Esco. The court, however, denied treble damages and certain additional costs, and Esco appeals from that part of the judgment. Tru-Rol, in turn, appeals from the award of attorney’s fees. Finding no error, we affirm for reasons adequately stated by the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ab Iro v. Otex, Inc.
566 F. Supp. 419 (D. South Carolina, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
489 F.2d 699, 180 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/esco-corp-v-tru-rol-co-ca4-1974.