Eschliman v. Vernon

New Mexico Supreme Court

Eschliman v. Vernon

171 P. 503, 24 N.M. 332

CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 6, 1918

DocketNo. 2050

StatusPublished

This text of 171 P. 503 (Eschliman v. Vernon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eschliman v. Vernon, 171 P. 503, 24 N.M. 332 (N.M. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT.

HANNA, C. J.

This case involves the constitutionality of chapter 94, Laws 1909, known as the “Herd Law.” . Tbe trial court beld. tbe act valid, and entered 'judgment lor appellee. Tbe objections urged to tbe act were fully considered by this court in tbe recent case of Scarbrough v. Wooten, 23 N. M. 616, 170 Pac. 743, decided at tbe present term. Adhering to that opinion, tbe judgment in this case will be affirmed; and it is so ordered.

PARKER and Roberts, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT.

HANNA, C. J.

This case involves the constitutionality of chapter 94, Laws 1909, known as the “Herd Law.” . Tbe trial court beld. tbe act valid, and entered 'judgment lor appellee. Tbe objections urged to tbe act were fully considered by this court in tbe recent case of Scarbrough v. Wooten, 23 N. M. 616, 170 Pac. 743, decided at tbe present term. Adhering to that opinion, tbe judgment in this case will be affirmed; and it is so ordered.

PARKER and Roberts, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 P. 503, 24 N.M. 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eschliman-v-vernon-nm-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack