Eschliman v. Vernon

New Mexico Supreme Court

Eschliman v. Vernon

171 P. 503, 24 N.M. 332

New Mexico Supreme Court·Decided March 6, 1918·No. No. 2050·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT.

HANNA, C. J.

This case involves the constitutionality of chapter 94, Laws 1909, known as the “Herd Law.” . Tbe trial court beld. tbe act valid, and entered 'judgment lor appellee. Tbe objections urged to tbe act were fully considered by this court in tbe recent case of Scarbrough v. Wooten, 23 N. M. 616, 170 Pac. 743, decided at tbe present term. Adhering to that opinion, tbe judgment in this case will be affirmed; and it is so ordered.

PARKER and Roberts, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT.

HANNA, C. J.

This case involves the constitutionality of chapter 94, Laws 1909, known as the “Herd Law.” . Tbe trial court beld. tbe act valid, and entered 'judgment lor appellee. Tbe objections urged to tbe act were fully considered by this court in tbe recent case of Scarbrough v. Wooten, 23 N. M. 616, 170 Pac. 743, decided at tbe present term. Adhering to that opinion, tbe judgment in this case will be affirmed; and it is so ordered.

PARKER and Roberts, JJ., concur.

Eschliman v. Vernon, 171 P. 503, 24 N.M. 332 (N.M. 1918).

Pincite

171 P. 503 (Eschliman v. Vernon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related