Eschenbrenner v. . Gude Bros. Kieffer Company

139 N.E. 736, 235 N.Y. 565, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1292
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 13, 1923·Published

Opinion

Appeal dismissed, with costs. Question certified involves question of discretion and, therefore, is not answered; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eschenbrenner v. . Gude Bros. Kieffer Company, 139 N.E. 736, 235 N.Y. 565, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1292 (N.Y. 1923).

139 N.E. 736 (Eschenbrenner v. . Gude Bros. Kieffer Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.