Eschenbrenner v. Gude Bros., Kieffer Co.
202 A.D. 752
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1922·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The privilege of inspection and discovery in cases of this character is given to plaintiff almost as matter of right. (Thomas v. Waite Co., 113 App. Div. 494, 496.) We have reiterated this doctrine in Lockwood v. Bedell Co. (178 App. Div. 695). The order is, therefore, reversed on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs. Rich, Kelly, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Eschenbrenner v. Gude Bros., Kieffer Co., 202 A.D. 752 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).
202 A.D. 752 (Eschenbrenner v. Gude Bros., Kieffer Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Union Trust Co. of Rochester v. Francis
154 Misc. 83 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)