Eschenbrenner v. Gude Bros., Kieffer Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eschenbrenner v. Gude Bros., Kieffer Co.

202 A.D. 752

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1922

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 202 A.D. 752 (Eschenbrenner v. Gude Bros., Kieffer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eschenbrenner v. Gude Bros., Kieffer Co., 202 A.D. 752 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

The privilege of inspection and discovery in cases of this character is given to plaintiff almost as matter of right. (Thomas v. Waite Co., 113 App. Div. 494, 496.) We have reiterated this doctrine in Lockwood v. Bedell Co. (178 App. Div. 695). The order is, therefore, reversed on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs. Rich, Kelly, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The privilege of inspection and discovery in cases of this character is given to plaintiff almost as matter of right. (Thomas v. Waite Co., 113 App. Div. 494, 496.) We have reiterated this doctrine in Lockwood v. Bedell Co. (178 App. Div. 695). The order is, therefore, reversed on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs. Rich, Kelly, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 A.D. 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eschenbrenner-v-gude-bros-kieffer-co-nyappdiv-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack