Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Escambia County v. U.I.L. Family Ltd. Partnership

Escambia County v. U.I.L. Family Ltd. Partnership

915 So. 2d 731, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19172, 2005 WL 3295662
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 7, 2005
DocketNo. 1D05-0473
StatusPublished

This text of 915 So. 2d 731 (Escambia County v. U.I.L. Family Ltd. Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Escambia County v. U.I.L. Family Ltd. Partnership, 915 So. 2d 731, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19172, 2005 WL 3295662 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to appellee’s motion to dismiss, we dismiss this appeal as premature, without prejudice, because the trial court’s order determined entitlement to attorney’s fees but reserved jurisdiction to determine the amount. See Benton v. Moore, 655 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Dockery v. Hood, 889 So.2d 221 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Scullin v. City of Pensacola, 667 So.2d 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

DISMISSED.

ERVIN, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scullin v. City of Pensacola
667 So. 2d 215 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Benton v. Moore
655 So. 2d 1272 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Dockery v. Hood
889 So. 2d 221 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
915 So. 2d 731, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19172, 2005 WL 3295662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/escambia-county-v-uil-family-ltd-partnership-fladistctapp-2005.