Escambia County v. U.I.L. Family Ltd. Partnership

915 So. 2d 731, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19172, 2005 WL 3295662
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 7, 2005·No. No. 1D05-0473·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to appellee’s motion to dismiss, we dismiss this appeal as premature, without prejudice, because the trial court’s order determined entitlement to attorney’s fees but reserved jurisdiction to determine the amount. See Benton v. Moore, 655 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Dockery v. Hood, 889 So.2d 221 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Scullin v. City of Pensacola, 667 So.2d 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

DISMISSED.

ERVIN, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Escambia County v. U.I.L. Family Ltd. Partnership, 915 So. 2d 731, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 19172, 2005 WL 3295662 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

915 So. 2d 731 (Escambia County v. U.I.L. Family Ltd. Partnership) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scullin v. City of Pensacola
667 So. 2d 215 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Benton v. Moore
655 So. 2d 1272 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Dockery v. Hood
889 So. 2d 221 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)