Escalona v. McDonough

950 So. 2d 484, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 2701, 2007 WL 556936
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 26, 2007
DocketNo. 1D06-4860
StatusPublished

This text of 950 So. 2d 484 (Escalona v. McDonough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Escalona v. McDonough, 950 So. 2d 484, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 2701, 2007 WL 556936 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit to petitioner’s claim that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law in denying his request for mandamus relief, and therefore deny the petition for writ of certiorari on the merits as to that issue. However, as respondent correctly concedes, petitioner’s claim below constituted a “collateral criminal proceeding,” and the circuit court was therefore without authority to impose a lien on petitioner’s inmate trust account to recoup filing fees and costs. See Wagner v. McDonough, 930 So.2d 710 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Accordingly, we vacate the order imposing a lien and direct the circuit court to ensure the reimbursement to petitioner of any funds collected pursuant thereto.

BROWNING, C.J., KAHN and LEWIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wagner v. McDonough
930 So. 2d 710 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
950 So. 2d 484, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 2701, 2007 WL 556936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/escalona-v-mcdonough-fladistctapp-2007.