Escalderon v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
210 P.3d 929, 229 Or. App. 174, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 808
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Escalderon v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. Read the opinion of the Court — 227 Or. App. 506 →
Opinion
Petitioner seeks reconsideration of our decision in Escalderon v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, 227 Or App 506, 206 P3d 286 (2009), asserting that we improperly awarded costs to respondent. We allow reconsideration and, based on Blacknall v. Board of Parole, 223 Or App 294, 196 P3d 20 (2008), rev allowed, 346 Or 65 (2009), adhere to the original result in this case.
Reconsideration allowed; prior disposition adhered to.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Escalderon v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, 210 P.3d 929, 229 Or. App. 174, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 808 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).
210 P.3d 929 (Escalderon v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blacknall v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
196 P.3d 20 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)
Escalderon v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
206 P.3d 286 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)